home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Developer CD Series 1997 January: Mac OS SDK / Dev.CD Jan 97 SDK2.toast / Development Kits (Disc 2) / OpenDoc Development Framework / ODF-Interest Archive / April 96 / Re OK, now what? < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-12-03  |  1.8 KB  |  [TEXT/ttxt]
  1. Subject:     Re: OK, now what?
  2. Sent:        4/17/96 5:41 PM
  3. Received:    4/17/96 5:41 PM
  4. From:        Jerome "At Home Goofing Off" Jahnke, j-jahnke@uchicago.edu
  5. Reply-To:    ODF-Interest@CILabs.ORG
  6. To:          OpenDoc Development Framework Discussion List, ODF-Interest@CILabs.
  7.  
  8. >RequestEmbeddedFrame was not yet supported by ODF d11 (don't forget the
  9. >version of ODF you have is a d release). ODFDraw or any other embedding
  10. >parts build with ODF d11 is not supporting RequestEmbeddedFrame. ODF
  11. >Release 1 is now supporting it and ODFDraw and ODFContainer behave
  12. >correctly.
  13.  
  14. OK, well that is good to hear, at least now I know that I am going on the
  15. right track.
  16.  
  17. >Which non-ODF embedding part are you using?
  18.  
  19. The non ODF Draw part that ships as part of OpenDoc. My part has other
  20. problems... but this is OK.
  21.  
  22. >You have to be aware that embedding part may decide to not support
  23. >RequestEmbeddedFrame.For example the ODFEmbed part can only embed one
  24. >frame at a time. ODFEmbed will never support RequestEmbeddedFrame. So as
  25. >an embedded part you need to be aware of this case, RequestEmbeddedFrame
  26. >may return null. Testing your part with containers that don't support
  27. >RequestEmbeddedFrame is a goog idea.
  28.  
  29. This is good to know, and I will do this, thanks.
  30.  
  31. Jer,
  32.  
  33.  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  34. | Jerome Jahnke                | Well I was only a kid                    |
  35. | University of Chicago        | Didn't know enough to be afraid          |
  36. | Biological Sciences Division | Playing the game                         |
  37. | Office of Academic Computing | But not the way the big boys played      |
  38. | j-jahnke@uchicago.edu        | Nothing to lose maybe I had something to |
  39. |                              | trade.                     N. Peart      |
  40.  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  41.  
  42.